![]() |
24-year-old James Holmes is suspected in the Aurora Massacre on July 20, 2012. (Credit: University of Colorado) |
Upon being arrested, the perpetrator was identified as 24-year-old James Holmes, originally of San Diego, California and currently residing in Aurora, Colorado. Details of the crime have been revealed since the chain of events unfolded. The general consensus is that Holmes purchased a ticket, left out an Emergency Exit, which was propped open, while he returned to his car to put on SWAT-type riot gear. Thirty minutes into the movie he then returned to the theater, threw down tear gas canisters and proceeded the massacre.
When he was arrested, Holmes identified himself as the "Joker", the prevalent villain from the second installment of the Christopher Nolan Batman series, The Dark Knight, who was famously portrayed by Heath Ledger.
With more information trickling in, such as the suspect's apartment apparently being "booby-trapped" for police, further builds the suspects character profile.
Now, I am not a psychologist, but my opinion is, this man was obviously negatively influenced by the Hollywood picture The Dark Knight.
If someone were asked to choose a word to describe the tone or theme of The Dark Knight, most certainly included on that list would be "chaos" and "anarchy", of which The Joker declares as his only intentions in a monologue to Aaron Eckhart's character Harvey Dent (which triggers his full-turn to the villain Two-Face, at that point in the film).
Now, how this relates to the Colorado shooting rampage, is that, this kind of thing has been happening with Hollywood films for years. While in my opinions, Christopher Nolan's Batman films are no where near the most intense terrorism-related homicide to the general populace I have ever seen, the imagery and ease in which he depicts chaos, could easily, in my opinion, be a catalyst for James Holmes' rampage last Friday.
Hollywood's responsibility for the actions of its film goers has been called into question for years. Most recently, and famously, is Oliver Stone's classic picture Natural Born Killers, which portrays a serial killer couple Mickey (Woody Harrelson) and Mallory Knox (Juliette Lewis) and their killing spree across the southwest desert of the United States and the media frenzy which surrounds them. This includes "fans" of Mickey and Mallory, and the host of a program called "American Psychos" (played by Robert Downey Jr.) who wants to interview them in prison to boost his own fame.
![]() |
Mickey (Woody Harrelson) and Mallory (Julliette Lewis) make killing look easy in Oliver Stone's 1994 film Natural Born Killers. (Photo Credit: The Escapist User Reviews) |
Natural Born Killers is the film most known for producing the most known copycat crimes, due to the severity of the tone of the film, its message has been twisted and misunderstood for years, as people try to emulate Mickey and Mallory. (For more information on specific cases, search List of alleged Natural Born Killers copycat crimes on Wikipedia).
Whether directly responsible for the crimes in question, or just a mild influence, Oliver Stone or the actors and creators of Natural Born Killers have never had to be held accountable for these crimes. In my opinion, this is rightfully so. Oliver Stone cannot be held responsible for how people may or may not react to his movie. However, the other side of the coin is, should Oliver Stone have known making a film with such extreme themes be made so, haphazardly...if that's the right word.
Christopher Nolan's themes of Batman are clearly not as extreme as those of Stone's Killers film. Good is expected to eventually triumph over evil in the superhero genre, and it is obviously played to an audience where mature children would be expected to be a large portion. So, obviously, the violence is toned down, the language is toned down and the situation is directed in a more serious tone, while keeping the innocence of that "superhero" quality.
![]() |
The Joker (Heath Ledger) tells Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart) to "introduce a little anarchy" in Christopher Nolan's 2008 film The Dark Knight. (Photo Credit: MoviesOnline.ca) |
The question that is called into play is, should Nolan be held responsible for the influence of violence his films have clearly created? A recent triple robbery-homicide committed right here in Edmonton at the University of Alberta was foreshadowed by Facebook quotes from The Dark Knight less than two weeks before Travis Baumgartner shot and killed his co-workers. James Holmes shot up Nolan's latest premiere and identified himself as "The Joker" upon arrest. These are two current examples which show Nolan's Batman film's cloud of influence and how people have clung to The Joker as an anti-hero (despite clearly being a villain) the same way people clung to Wall Street's Gordon Gekko as an anti-hero, despite clearly being a person who valued money over anything and everything else and was portrayed very negatively.
Obviously, James Holmes' psychological profile will take years to build and present to a court, before he is eventually convicted of life in prison anyways, so this post I've written may be a little premature, however, focusing on these small details in this large crime, it is easy to analyze that the motion picture industry at the very least, needs to be a little more careful of the extreme themes their films are presenting and that they can make extreme violence look very easy, without demonstrating all the consequences.
-Adam Orion